Subject: Teamsters Target Healthcare, Q3 Petition/Election Report, 3 SCOTUS Cases: LRI INK

October 23, 2025

To visit the blog post, click on the link below the article.

The Teamsters’ Poaching of Nurses: A Wake-Up Call for Their Lack of Healthcare Expertise

by Kimberly Ricci

Much has rightfully been made about low private-sector union density, so it makes sense that unions are desperate to build up membership and keep dues money flowing. Hence why the United Auto Workers have gone in hard on higher-ed workers and why Machinists are poaching pharmacists.

 

However, the Teamsters might be the most aggressive poachers of the bunch. The deep-pocketed union has traditionally been known for its transportation, freight, and logistics organizing, but regularly branches out into hospitality, Hollywood, and healthcare. 

 

The Teamsters now want to mass-organize Michigan nurses, despite the existence of multiple established nursing unions within the state, including the National Nurses United-affiliated Michigan Nurses Association. So, is this a case of smoke and mirrors, like the Teamsters declaring that they have “embarked on an ambitious campaign to organize workers in the tech industry,” when those workers were transport drivers on tech campuses? 

 

Not quite. In fact, the Teamsters are doing their best to dirty up healthcare. Most recently, the union showcased a few wins in Michigan and took blustery aim at Henry Ford Health Genesys Hospital:

 

Emotional Manipulation

Since early September, 600 Teamster nurses have been on strike over contract negotiations. The union has also been crafting fiction about why the hospital “turned away striking nurses” after a mass shooting. 


Henry Ford set the record straight on how they arranged adequate staffing for this indefinite strike, so they were prepared when tragedy struck. Also, legal and ethical requirements require that when medical workers strike, their system credentials are suspended to protect patient privacy under HIPAA and guard against potential security breaches. 


Clearly, the Teamsters are attempting to manipulate public opinion at Henry Ford, where hospital officials asked that union officials cease “us[ing] the tragedy that occurred in our community as a bargaining tool.”


Dangerous Union-Orchestrated Absenteeism

Henry Ford also published a statement about how the Teamsters have conducted around 60 negotiation sessions, demanding a premium-pay rate policy that “incentivizes coordinated call-outs” by boosting pay for nurses who come to work during heightened absenteeism.


The hospital system further alleged that, prior to the current strike, the Teamsters were guiding members to “take turns calling off scheduled shifts,” which “helped to put Genesys Hospital in danger of closing,” resulting in a reported $54 million loss in 2024. As Henry Ford representatives concluded, “If the union truly cared for patients, they would… help ensure the hospital remains open.”


In a separate statement, Henry Ford representatives pointed to their most current contract offer, which includes wages competitive with those of other Michigan hospitals. That is, around 60% RNs at Genesys will exceed $100,000 in base pay, without inclusion of a premium-pay policy that can jeopardize patient safety by encouraging absenteeism.


Conclusion

With their relatively new focus on nursing, the Teamsters are applying a one-size-fits-all, confrontational approach to healthcare systems, and this could be disastrous for patient care. Additionally, it’s hard to imagine that the Teamsters have the expertise to understand nurses' specialized workplace concerns or the nuances of running hospital systems.


The union’s lack of healthcare knowledge is already on display in its tactics against Henry Ford Genesys Hospital, seemingly without regard for the effects on care. It’s another case of unions making promises they can’t keep, only with higher stakes that will likely backfire on the union, before they harm the patients and workers they claim to represent.

Q3 2025 LRICS NLRB Petitions/Elections Report: Fewer Campaigns, Smarter Tactics, Shifting Risks

by Michael VanDervort

Union activity cooled in Q3 2025 — and that’s not necessarily bad news for employers.


The new LRI RightNow Petitions and Elections Review shows petition and election volume declined year-over-year, marking a slowdown from 2024’s peak levels. Unions may be winning a higher percentage of elections, but the total number of new members they’re adding has fallen sharply. The data paints a clear picture: organizing in 2025 isn’t accelerating — it’s tightening. Unions are filing fewer cases, targeting smaller workplaces, and prioritizing campaigns they’re confident they can win.

Election Activity Down, Win Rates Up — But Fewer Members Gained

Union organizing slowed across all categories, even as win rates climbed.

  • Representation (RC) elections: 1,162 held (-15 % from 2024)

    • Unions won 79.3 %, organizing 55,916 workers.

  • Decertification (RD) elections: 99 held (-21 %)

    • Unions lost 58.6 %, cutting roughly 2,000 members.

  • Employer-filed (RM) elections: 69 held (-50 %)

    • Unions won 78.3 %, up from 68.8 % in 2024.

Despite maintaining a near-record 79 % win rate, unions organized roughly 55,900 workers through Q3 2025 — down from more than 81,000 over the same period in 2024.


That’s not expansion; it’s efficiency. Higher win rates paired with fewer campaigns signal tighter targeting and smaller-scale victories, not broad momentum.


Petitions Decline Across the Board

  • Representation (RC) petitions: 1,588 filed (-14 %), 73 % converted to elections.

  • Decertification (RD) petitions: 226 filed (-8 %), 44 % conversion.

  • Employer-filed (RM) petitions: 150 filed (-55 %), 46 % conversion (up from 41 % in 2024).

Steady conversion rates show unions executing more efficiently — but on a smaller playing field. For employers, that means campaign risk may becoming more concentrated, not more widespread.

Union Activity Concentrates in Familiar Territory

The Teamsters remained the most active, appearing in 195 RC elections and winning 71 %.


Next came:

  • Workers United (SEIU): 152 elections, 83 % win rate

  • Service Employees (SEIU): 122 elections, 89 % win rate

  • IBEW (Electrical Workers): 75 elections, 89 % win rate

  • Operating Engineers: 68 elections, 79 % win rate

The 25 most active unions accounted for 85 % of all RC elections — reinforcing that organizing strength remains highly concentrated within a few large, well-resourced organizations rather than broad-based growth.


Regional & Industry Highlights

  • Region 19 (Seattle) led all regions with 174 RC petitions filed, continuing its long-running lead in union activity.

  • California topped all states with 220 RC petitions and 165 elections held, while New Jersey recorded the lowest success rate among high-volume states.

  • Healthcare and Social Assistance remained the top sector for organizing, driving 265 RC elections, while Manufacturing again proved most resistant with a 60 % union win rate.

The takeaway: organizing activity remains concentrated in the same industries and geographies that have led the movement for the past several years.

Unit Size: Small Wins, Smaller Impact

  • 11–25 employee units: 86 % win rate — highest of any group

  • 1–10 employee units: 72 % win rate — lowest

Unions continue to find success in smaller units, but the trade-off is clear: higher win rates paired with smaller headcounts yield limited long-term growth.


The Bottom Line

Union activity in 2025 looks less like a wave and more like a realignment.
It appears organizers are choosing smaller, safer targets and celebrating percentage wins that mask declining overall reach. For employers, this environment rewards those who track the data, identify emerging hotspots early, and strengthen culture before small groups turn into organized units.


Access the Full Report

The complete LRI RightNow 2025 Q3 Petitions and Elections Review — with charts, maps, and regional breakdowns — is available now at:
👉 LRI RightNow Store ($150)


💡 Did You Know?

When the NLRB website went down, LRI RightNow was still able to deliver historical petition and election updates without interruption. That’s why practitioners rely on LRI RightNow for the most current, verified labor data in the country, even when the Board goes dark.

Three Crucial Supreme Court Cases for Employers to Watch This Term

by Kimberly Ricci

The Supreme Court is still in business amid the government shutdown. This current term began in early October with initial arguments beginning soon for cases to be decided before June 2026. This term, three particular cases will be of interest for employers across multiple industries.

Trump v. Slaughter

Those who have followed the NLRB-quorum saga know that Gwynne Wilcox still awaits news of whether her firing by President Trump will stand. The Supreme Court isn’t currently slated to hear Trump v. Wilcox, which has been remanded to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


However, the court will hear Trump v. Slaughter, which revolves around ex-FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and whether Trump can fire the head of independent federal agencies without cause. In doing so, SCOTUS will decide whether to overrule or narrow Humphrey’s Executor--precedent also cited in Trump v. Wilcox--and determine whether removal protections are unconstitutional, at least as applied to FTC members.


The outcome of Trump v. Slaughter could influence federal courts to strike down removal protections for various other independent federal agencies, potentially extending to the Merit Systems Protection Board, along with the NLRB and Gwynne Wilcox.


What employers should know: If the Supreme Court overturns Humphrey's Executor, then presumably, Wilcox’s firing will stand, which opens an NLRB spot for a more employer-friendly member. However, such an outcome would install a precedent that could backfire under future administrations, setting the stage for more NLRB unpredictability.

M & K Employee Solutions v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund

This case concerns the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers National Pension Fund, which is separate from the union itself and is a multiemployer plan that, pursuant to collective bargaining agreements, is largely funded through employer contributions.


Companies that withdraw participation in multiemployer pension plans are required to pay for unfunded vested benefits as a “withdrawal liability.” Here, the Supreme Court will consider how the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) precisely determines valuation dates for employers to calculate this liability. As one can imagine, different calculation dates can vastly increase or decrease these amounts.


What employers should know: The court’s decision in this case will affect about 1,400 plans, which include around 10 million participants. During the wait for a ruling, companies face uncertainty on when they’re allowed to exit deteriorating pension plans without adverse legal consequences.

The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal

This complicated case will be of interest to employers who contract with federal, state, or local governments, and the Supreme Court will decide whether denials of “derivative sovereign immunity” can be immediately appealed under the collateral-order doctrine.


The facts involve private-prison operator GEO Group, which became embroiled in a class-action lawsuit filed by immigrant detainees who performed janitorial services and other work in Colorado. The plaintiffs alleged that this low-paid work was forced labor in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.

GEO Group claimed derivative sovereign immunity due to following directives laid out in Immigration and Customs Enforcement contracts. In 2022, a district court struck down this defense, and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed GEO’s immediate appeal. A circuit split now puts the case in the Supreme Court’s hands.


What employers should know: Employers who perform government contract work should consider their potential labor law exposure if similar immunity defenses are no longer readily available, or appealable when denied. Additionally, employers should examine existing contracts and plan for future contracts accordingly.


Conclusion: These cases won’t be resolved soon, perhaps not until June 2026. However, employers will want to monitor news of initial arguments and be prepared to adapt accordingly when rulings arrive.


Friday Five: New Studies, New Legislation, And A New "Friendship"

by Kimberly Ricci

It’s Friday, and we have five labor-related stories that you might not have heard yet:


💊🩺 A treasure trove for healthcare employee relations pros

Our partners at HR Acuity just released their Ninth Employee Relations Benchmark Study, and it is a doozy. The downloadable study contains every conceivable data point on how ER teams strengthen processes and weigh resources to meet the unique urgency of healthcare systems.


The report also contains a wealth of actionable ideas that healthcare execs can use, in the words of HR Acuity CEO Deb Muller, “to drive strategy and help build fair, transparent and healthy workplaces -- so you can focus on what matters most: Delivering exceptional care for both patients and employees, while protecting your organization.”

🧰 Only 40% of Americans have a “quality” job

The above figure comes from Gallup’s The American Job Quality Study, which gathered responses from 18,000 workers to provide data on “the real story of work in America today.” The study goes far beyond wages to establish a benchmark for evaluating job satisfaction in the present and future, with indicators including workers feeling that they have a voice, control over scheduling, and opportunities for growth and advancement.


Although Gallup expects to further evolve these benchmarks, the study provides valuable insight into what job satisfaction really means, how it ties into burnout, and what workers require to thrive in their jobs. In turn, satisfied workers are indicative of overall U.S. economic health, so the study should prove fruitful for years to come.

🧠 OpenAI’s semi-for-profit plan includes a labor leader

The ChatGPT owner pulled together a temporary advisory commission that includes an American labor leader. National Farm Workers Association co-founder Dolores Huerta joins a politically diverse group – including GOP campaign fundraiser and attorney Jack Oliver, former Gavin Newsom aide Daniel Zingale, and media exec Monica Lozano – to make philanthropic recommendations for the AI company.


Over the course of 90 days, the group also will address “both the promise and risks of AI” while soliciting feedback on what charitable duties that OpenAI should embrace. For the time being, OpenAI is still controlled by a nonprofit board, and the startup has hit some obstacles in a quest to become a public company.


Additionally, CEO Sam Altman has been candid about the company’s multibillion dollar losses and long road to profitability.

💥🪓 An unlikely burying of the hatchet

Sean O’Brien recently spoke during a Senate HELP Committee hearing, where Sen. Josh Hawley warmly welcomed the Teamsters president. Together, they waxed rhapsodic about the Faster Contracts Labor Act, which wasn’t surprising since the pair collaborated on a so-called “Pro-Worker Framework.” The more shocking aspect of this hearing was the burying of a hatchet between O’Brien and Sen. Markwayne Mullen (R-OK).


Their long-lived public feud culminated in 2023 and included social media barbs, a “cage match” challenge, and each telling the other to “stand your butt up” during a fiery 2023 hearing. Apparently, Mullin has now forgiven the Teamsters for lurking outside his plumbing business back in the day.


Fast forward to October 2025, and Mullin declared, “I guess everybody’s surprised to see Sean and I on the same page… I’d like to welcome you back to the committee and call you my friend.” O’Brien’s response: “For the record, I’m not a hugger, but I’ll shake your hand.” Well then.

⚙️👷 More labor-related legislation of interest

This week, Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) introduced the Employee Rights Act, which is a companion bill to a House resolution that surfaced in June. Both pieces of legislation aim to do the following:

  • Mandate secret elections for union representation, i.e. no card check.

  • Require workers to explicitly opt-in before being required to pay union dues that aren’t used for collective bargaining or contract administration. Annual renewal is also required for this opt-in.

  • Amend the Hobbs Act to address union violence and criminalize obstruction of commerce through violence during strikes.

  • Allow employer action against harassment during labor disputes.

This is still early days for the bill, and as we’re all aware, the Senate is occupied with shutdown votes, but we’ll watch for further developments.


Stories You May Have Missed:


NLRB Sues California Over Dramatically Expanding State Labor Board’s Powers to Cover Employees Under NLRB’s Exclusive Jurisdiction

Link


Starbucks Baristas File Brief Urging Supreme Court to Allow President to Remove Rogue Agency Officers

Link


What to Make of "Premajority" Unionism

Link


How Josh Hawley Is Empowering Unions in New York and California

Link


Starbucks severance package revealed for baristas and supervisors

Link

About Labor Relations INK

Labor Relations INK is published weekly and is edited by LRI Consulting Services, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up by visiting here.


If you use content from this newsletter, please attribute it to LRI Consulting Services, Inc. and include our website: http://www.LRIonline.com 


Contributing editors for this issue: Greg Kittinger, Michael VanDervort, and Kimberly Ricci.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.


About LRI Consulting Services, Inc.

LRI Consulting Services, Inc. exists to help our clients thrive and become extraordinary workplaces. We improve the lives of working people by strengthening relationships with their leaders and each other. For over 40 years, LRI Consulting Services, Inc. has led the labor and employee relations industry, driven by our core values and our proven process, the LRI Way.

 

Share