Subject: What the Latest Senate Hearing Revealed About America’s Labor Law System: LRI INK

October 9, 2025

To visit the blog post, click on the link below the article.

What the Latest Senate Hearing Revealed About America’s Labor Law System

by Michael VanDervort

10/9 Update: The HELP Committee endorsed James Murphy and Crystal Carey, nominees for the National Labor Relations Board and general counsel. The nomination for Scott Mayer, Chief Labor Counsel at Boeing Company, was withdrawn from the vote for the time being. 


Recent headlines paint a rosy picture of rising union victories at companies like Amazon, Starbucks, and Volkswagen. However, a recent Senate HELP Committee hearing presented a more sobering reality: for many workers, winning a union vote is only the beginning of a much longer, more complex battle, one that unfolds between corporate boardrooms, government agencies, and legislative gridlock.


This hearing brought together union leaders, frontline workers, policy analysts, and former NLRB officials. The result? A rare, unfiltered look at how America’s labor law system really functions and where it’s failing.


Winning the Election Isn’t the Finish Line

Volkswagen autoworker Steve Cochran told senators his coworkers voted for the UAW by a 3-to-1 ratio nearly 18 months ago. Yet, they still don’t have a contract.


“We are still waiting for a proposal that affords us our fair share,” he said. “We’re living with health care that forces people into bankruptcy.”


Teamsters President Sean O’Brien backed him up with the data: nearly half of new unions fail to secure a contract in their first year, and a third still don’t have one after two.


For HR and ER pros, the takeaway is blunt: the end of an election is just the start of your labor relations challenge. Managing expectations, maintaining open communication, and ensuring operational consistency are crucial during this transitional period.


The NLRB: Out of Money, Out of Time

Former NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo pulled no punches:

“Corporations can afford to drag out government processes; workers cannot.”

She testified that the NLRB is chronically underfunded and understaffed, and has been operating for months without a quorum, resulting in cases languishing. Without enforcement, she argued that employers can violate labor law with near impunity.


For managers, this means don’t expect quick answers from Washington. The enforcement vacuum increases pressure on company leaders to self-police their actions and maintain credibility with employees. Even the appearance of retaliation can carry significant reputational costs in today’s social media-driven climate.


The “Faster Labor Contracts Act”: Help or Hurdle?

Lawmakers from both parties are pushing the Faster Labor Contracts Act, designed to fast-track first contracts through strict timelines and binding arbitration if no deal is reached within 120 days.


Supporters say it would end the post-election stalemate that leaves workers in limbo. Critics, like Rachel Greszler of the Heritage Foundation, warn that it could strip workers of their right to vote on contracts, slow the process through arbitration, and reduce the economic leverage of strikes.


Translation: even fixes come with fine print. “Speed” and “fairness” rarely travel together in labor law.


The Strange New Labor Alliances

A growing alliance between organized labor and conservative Republicans, such as Senator Josh Hawley.


Teamsters’ O’Brien called it a “realignment,” one that’s moving away from partisan showmanship toward pragmatic, single-issue reform. Bipartisan bills, such as the Faster Labor Contracts Act, reflect this new dynamic, uniting unlikely bedfellows from Hawley to Democratic Representative Donald Norcross.

For HR leaders, this could signal a new legislative era where traditional party lines on labor are blurring, and “pro-worker” doesn’t necessarily mean “pro-union.”


“The System Works,” Says Former NLRB Chair

Former NLRB Chair Marvin Kaplan offered a reality check.
He argued that the current system isn’t broken — it’s just deliberate.


“Good faith bargaining over complex issues takes time,” Kaplan said. “Bad facts make bad law.”


He cited data showing 70% of new unions reach an agreement within three years. To him, patience is not dysfunction; it’s a process.


But for workers like Cochran, now more than 540 days into a waiting game, that patience appears to be a system stuck on pause.


Why This Matters for HR and ER Professionals

The hearing underscored a truth that labor pros already know:
Labor law is as much about timing and perception as it is about rules.

  • Post-election fatigue is real. Maintain open communication to avoid losing trust.

  • Agency gridlock shifts responsibility for fairness and transparency to your internal culture.

  • Legislative changes could come faster or stranger than expected as new coalitions form.

  • Union frustration with delays means the next wave of organizing will likely be more aggressive and better coordinated.

The vote is behind you, but now the real work begins. It’s time to build authentic relationships with employees and learn to navigate the union landscape with clarity and respect. How you respond today will define your culture tomorrow.

 

On October 16, join Mike VanDervort and Phil Wilson to explore what it means to operate Left of Boom. Every workplace has a potential “boom” moment, and proactively managing risk can make all the difference. 

 

During this session, we’ll discuss strategies for:

  • Uncovering blind spots early to protect your organization’s culture

  • Using objective vulnerability assessments to expose hidden risks

  • Replacing reactive quick fixes with lasting trust-building strategies

  • Informed decision-making and leading with resilience and consistency over the next 52 weeks

This session will be a window into LRI’s new podcast series, The Next 52 WeeksPlease come prepared to discuss practical ways to foster trust, open dialogue and create a path forward where everyone feels heard and valued.


Register here to participate. empowER is quick to join and free: Webinar Link

Strikes Without Solutions: When Union Tactics Hurt Healthcare Workers Most

by Kimberly Ricci


The old Kaiser Permanente saga often feels like it’s new again, but the healthcare consortium’s labor woes never seem to go away. In 2022, Kaiser mental healthcare workers went on a 10-week strike in California and a 172-day strike in Hawaii. In 2023, the “largest” healthcare strike on record included 75,000 workers outside Kaiser facilities in several states, and in spring 2025, a Southern California walkout ran for 196 days.

 

Now, a coalition of unions is threatening another voluminous strike against Kaiser. Although this impending walkout isn’t projected to last long, it’s symptomatic of an ongoing Big Labor clash that hasn’t brought meaningful results to workers. Will the results here be the same?

 

One progressive outlet quoted a Kaiser nurse who claimed that their “union isn’t even paying strike pay” for the upcoming picket lines. So, what’s in it for these workers? That’s a fine question.

 

What’s at stake: The United Nurses Association of California/Union of Health Care Professionals (UNAC/UHCP) delivered notice of an Oct. 14 strike. The notice specifies a five-day walkout for “tens of thousands” of nurses and other medical workers at dozens of Kaiser facilities in Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, and California, with emphasis in the Bay area.

 

This strike would follow the expiration of contracts on Sept. 30 and Oct. 1, with bargaining scheduled through Oct. 10. The Alliance of Health Care Unions announced participation from an array of locals, and this walkout will involve anywhere from 31,000 to 46,000 workers, including pharmacists, physician assistants, rehab therapists, and more specialties.

 

Key issues: For the previous mental healthcare strikes, a core grievance involved therapist-to-patient ratios; the newly threatened strike rests heavily on nurse-to-patient ratios. Other issues include wages and the demand for pension plans as part of a retirement package. 

 

Recent history suggests the next strike will only hurt workers: After the 2022 strike in California, mental healthcare workers returned to their jobs with no meaningful results and without resolution of core grievances. And the 196-day 2025 strike in California resulted in a 20% wage increase over four years rather than the 40% demanded by unions.

 

Unfortunately, those Kaiser nurses found themselves working at additional jobs after picketing during the day. They clearly didn’t receive the results promised by unions, which says nothing of how employers are pressured by unions while also working within financial realities to stay in business and keep employing workers.

 

The above-quoted Kaiser nurse–the same worker who disclosed that the Oct. 14 strike won’t include strike pay–firmly believes that “the unions are sleeping with management.” She further remarked upon her shock at hearing that her union had already revised its demand for raises down to 27 percent rather than 35. Of her own financial obligations to the union, she added, “I owe a thousand dollars in dues and can’t even pay it all at once.” 

 

Conclusion: Kaiser noted that the new notice follows their participation in five national bargaining sessions and over 700 local sessions with Alliance unions over contract renewal negotiations. 

 

Whether or not this strike will be averted at the eleventh hour, we’ll soon find out. However, it’s clear that the coalition’s strikes against Kaiser are characteristic of unions digging their claws into workplaces, and both workers and a major employer will be paying the price.

California Dreaming: An NLRB Power Grab Meets A Rideshare Union Push

by Kimberly Ricci

The California labor laboratory is at it again. Actually, the Golden State is running slightly behind its coastal sibling, New York, in the quest to claim jurisdiction over labor disputes while the NLRB lacks a quorum. Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen already made clear that he isn't impressed by these states taking action, which he called an attack on the Board’s “core jurisdiction” while threatening to sue New York.

 

The Board made good on that threat while alleging that New York is attempting to “unlawfully usurp” federal power by putting the state’s Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) in charge of private-sector labor disputes. Of course, states do not have this authority, but that isn’t stopping them from putting Garmon preemption to the test. 

 

Case in point: California went there, too. This month, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 288, which is purportedly triggered by the Board’s lack of quorum to issue binding decisions, along with the lack of funding that’s currently a factor due to the government shutdown.

 

This bill won’t stand, long term. Eventually, the NLRB’s quorum will be restored, although that timeline remains foggy due to Sen. Josh Hawley possibly thwarting an upcoming Senate HELP Committee vote on Board nominees Scott Mayer and James Murphy.

 

Yet when the NLRB can once again issue rulings, the feds will have a hefty clean-up on whatever actions New York and California have taken on labor disputes. If these states manage to, say, certify union petition votes, adjudicate ULP charges, or issue their own “binding” guidance, get ready for lengthy legal fallout for employers.

 

Meanwhile, the California governor wasn’t done taking swings at the feds.

 

A double-edged rideshare sword: Newsom signed legislation that gives up to 800,000 rideshare drivers a path to unionize. “In an era when the federal government is abandoning employees,” reads his announcement. “California is expanding workers’ voice and agency in the economy.”

 

Yet this isn’t a law that could work out well for these workers. As we have discussed, the SEIU-lobbied AB 1340 does not reclassify these drivers as employees. They remain independent contractors but can organize and collectively bargain over wages, benefits, and other working conditions. 

 

In doing so, this bill virtually guarantees that these drivers will lose some freedoms associated with gig work if they do unionize, which will require living under a union constitution.  

 

Additionally, a skeptical driver spoke with CBS News to discuss this legislation’s flaws, which include not clarifying what wages will be during contract negotiations. The drivers also expressed concern at how rideshare drivers are “really facing AI and Algorithmic discrimination in a way that no one has,” and AB 1340 does nothing to address this matter.

 

On a more business-friendly note, Newsom also signed SB 371, which limits the amount of uninsured motorist insurance that Uber and Lyft must carry for rideshare drivers.

 

Conclusion: These California shenanigans are largely the work of SEIU lobbying with the goal of–as with the state’s recent creation of a Fast Food Council–creating illusory unions through sectoral bargaining of industries. Such faux-unions make no guarantees for workers in improving workplace conditions, but workers will be asked to opt into paying dues.


Also, keep an eye out for similar rideshare organizing tactics in several other states, including Massachusetts, which recently took that plunge in allowing Uber and Lyft drivers to unionize.

Friday Five: From Capitol Fights And California Moves To Strikes And Stalemates

by Kimberly Ricci

It’s Friday, and we have five labor-related stories that you might not have heard yet:


🏛️ Josh Hawley Was No HELP To A Trump NLRB Nom:

Amid the government shutdown, two Board nominees had their hearing with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Both James Murphy, who’s the former chief counsel to ex-Chair Marvin Kaplan, and Scott Mayer asserted that their judgment would remain independent of the president’s views, despite Gwynne Wilcox’s booting. 


If you guessed that Josh Hawley, BFF to Teamsters President Sean O’Brien, tried to throw up a roadblock in proceedings, you’d be correct.


The conservative senator from Missouri previously got combative with General Counsel nominee Crystal Carey. This week, he grilled Scott Mayer, who’s currently Boeing Co’s chief labor counsel, about the ongoing St. Louis strike. Hawley also took a moment to throw darts over 2024’s IAM strike against Boeing in Washington.


And speaking of Boeing…


✈️ Machinist Maneuvers Backfire Upon Workers

The aerospace industry’s labor tensions are still at peak level with IAM’s St. Louis strike reaching its ninth week with no signs of a resolution in sight. Members recently rejected a 5-year deal with a 24% wage increase and a $4,000 signing bonus. Then IAM threw a curveball by announcing their own proposed contract and claiming that members would vote on it.

 

Air Dominance VP Dan Gillian called that union-proposed contract a non-starter, and this week, Gillian announced that Boeing held a hiring event for permanent replacement workers and “received hundreds of qualified applicants” for the fighter-jet focused St. Louis plant.


This sounds like another case of a company doing what it must do to meet business demands while a union hurts the members whose interests they claim to represent. 


🌴 ⚖️ California Takes The NLRB Plunge:

States are continuing to try and fill the void left by a quorum-less Board.

After NY Gov. Kathy Hochul signed legislation aiming to expand jurisdiction over labor disputes involving private employers, California has gone the same route. To that end, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a Teamsters-lobbied bill claiming to grant the state’s Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) authority to certify union elections, handle collective bargaining disputes, and adjudicate ULP charges. 


Additionally, AB 288 would launch a PERB Enforcement Fund that would be funded through collecting civil penalties against private employers found to violate the state’s labor laws. 


Although this “solution” will not stand long term—Garmon preemption ensures that states do not have jurisdiction over matters covered by the NLRA—states will likely still try to create more chaos.


🚗 UAW Revving Toward A Tennessee Strike:

The UAW refuses to agree on a first-ever contract at a Southern, foreign-owned auto plant. After unionizing Volkswagen’s Chattanooga plant in April 2024, almost a year of bargaining hasn’t closed the deal. The company’s “best, final offer”—including a 20% pay bump over four years along with more PTO and reduced healthcare premiums--arrived a few weeks ago.


In response, the UAW went silent before distributing strike cards among members. The union now insists that it’s not done bargaining but moved into strike-training mode, so we’ll see if an authorization happens.


🤖 🎬 The AI story you might not expect:

We’ll finish this Friday Five with AI-generated "actress" Tilly Norwood, who is all the rage with talent agents, according to Tilly’s creator, actor-comedian Eline Van der Velden. Whether that last detail is true, actors’ union SAG-AFTRA isn’t waiting to find out. 


“To be clear, ‘Tilly Norwood’ is not an actor,” the union declared. “It’s a character generated by a computer program that was trained on the work of countless professional performers -- without permission or compensation.” For what it’s worth, Justine Bateman previously warned SAG-AFTRA about this kind of scenario during 2023 contract negotiations that didn’t result in the “meaningful protections” promised by the union. 


Stories You May Have Missed:


Union activity at hotels takes a quieter tone in 2025

Link


NLRB rejects company challenge to Anodyne workers' unionization vote

Link


IAM Southern States Join Together to Build Legislative and Political Power

Link


What American Voters Really Think About Unions

Link

About Labor Relations INK

Labor Relations INK is published weekly and is edited by LRI Consulting Services, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up by visiting here.


If you use content from this newsletter, please attribute it to LRI Consulting Services, Inc. and include our website: http://www.LRIonline.com 


Contributing editors for this issue: Greg Kittinger, Michael VanDervort, and Kimberly Ricci.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.


About LRI Consulting Services, Inc.

LRI Consulting Services, Inc. exists to help our clients thrive and become extraordinary workplaces. We improve the lives of working people by strengthening relationships with their leaders and each other. For over 40 years, LRI Consulting Services, Inc. has led the labor and employee relations industry, driven by our core values and our proven process, the LRI Way.

 

Share