Subject: LRI INK: Warding Off Future No-Quorum Dilemmas, We Need Your Help

January 22, 2026

To visit the blog post, click on the link below the article.

We Need Your Help. Five Minutes. 

by Michael VanDervort

Labor relations operates on instinct more than they should.

Benchmarks are thin and most employers don’t know how they really stack up.

We need your help because we’re trying to build the first practical, data-driven view of how labor relations actually works across unionized employers.


If you manage or support union environments, please give us about five minutes. In return, you will:

  • Help create meaningful LR benchmarks, not war stories

  • Gain future insight into how you compare to peers

  • Strengthen the collective understanding of grievances, arbitrations, and contract administration

  • Receive Managing the Union Shop Toolkit and other goodies just for participating

Be a part of the solution! Help move labor relations from anecdotes to answers.


Take the survey here:  https://benchmark.fillout.com/labor


Labor Relations Insight. Powered by practitioners. Improved by you.


Your data is confidential. We use it only to generate your report and aggregate industry benchmarks. Your company is never identified.


The 'New' NLRB’s First Published Decision Is All About Warding Off More No-Quorum Dilemmas

by Kimberly Ricci

Early last year, while speaking to Bloomberg Law, HR Policy Association Senior Labor and Employment Counsel Roger King forecast a "lost year for substantive change" at the NLRB. That prediction turned out to be accurate with the Board lacking a quorum, i.e., at least three members as defined by New Process Steel v. NLRB, for almost a year.


The Board is now moving through its case backlog, but if you wondered how this agency would publicly begin its new era, they didn’t keep their audience waiting long. And in doing so, the Board is strategically warding off future chaos while attempting to ensure stability in federal labor law by leaning on regional directors if needed.

The Board is looking toward future challenges on regional authority

Board members James Murphy and Scott Mayer have now joined David Prouty, whose term will end on August 27. There’s no way to predict whether another Trump nominee will be confirmed by that date, which would leave the board short of a quorum again.


For now, the NLRB is forging ahead and has already issued at least 25 unpublished decisions and a first published decision that addresses what happens if "no quorum" arises again.


In this newly issued decision, the Board confirmed that regional directors (RDs) have the authority to certify union election results and perform other functions related to representation cases when the Board lacks a quorum. In doing so, the Board cited Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo while rejecting Satellite Healthcare’s argument that RDs lack this authority. This employers’ argument was not an isolated one, since in June 2025, “at least nine companies” made that challenge over election disputes.

The NLRB also issued a silver lining: Predictability

Granted, the "new" NLRB’s first published decision is not great news for employers who would prefer election decisions from the top, rather than from a regional office, if a quorum doesn’t exist.


Yet the Board's first public decision aims to iron out its own structural vulnerabilities to prevent future headaches. By settling the RD delegation issue, the NLRB affirmed a method to solve some disputes even when the Board itself cannot. And if the lack of a quorum drags on again, regional labor law decisions would be preferable to an entirely paralyzed agency, which could lead to blue states trying to claim authority again.


After all, California and New York tried to create their own mini-NLRAs by asserting that their versions of a Public Employment Relations Board could settle labor disputes during the absence of a quorum. This was a test of Garmon preemption, and federal judges issued preliminary injunctions, one requested by an employer and one by the NLRB itself, against both states’ laws. The Satellite Healthcare decision could further discourage states’ shenanigans if the quorum evaporates later this year.

Stability ahead? The Board sure hopes so

With this published decision, the Board is sending a clear message about its jurisdiction while warding off the uncertainty that engulfed labor law in 2025. As employers experienced last year, the absence of Board guidance is not a comforting prospect from any side of a labor dispute, and arguably, any movement toward stability is better than zero movement.


SHRM | Federal Labor Law May Be Headed for Change

by Michael VanDervort

SHRM published an article by Michael VanDervort examining how federal labor law may be on the verge of significant change.


In Federal Labor Law May Be Headed for Change, VanDervort outlines how shifts at the National Labor Relations Board, combined with proposed legislative reforms, could reshape the rules governing union elections, enforcement priorities, and employer compliance strategies.


The article focuses on what these potential changes mean in practice for HR, employee relations, and labor relations leaders who are navigating an increasingly unsettled regulatory environment.


Why it matters:
Federal labor law has been marked by sharp policy swings in recent years. Understanding the direction of travel matters as much as knowing the current rules. VanDervort’s analysis helps practitioners anticipate where risk, enforcement, and organizing dynamics may be headed next.


🔗 Read the full article on SHRM (login required):
https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/employment-law-compliance/federal-labor-law-may-be-headed-change

Friday Five: Healthcare Walkouts, Cannabis Rules, AI Battles, And NLRB Preparations

by Kimberly Ricci

The NLRB might be preparing for another lack of quorum:

The Board has just regained their 3-member quorum after going without for most of 2025, and they are aiming to mitigate the effects of a repeat. That is a real prospect, given that David Prouty’s term will end on Aug. 27, and there’s no telling whether another Trump nominee will be ready to roll then.


To that end, the NLRB issued a decision confirming that regional directors have authority to certify union election results and perform other functions related to representation cases when the Board lacks a quorum.


It’s also worth noting that state attempts to create their own mini-NLRAs have faltered. In late November, a New York federal judge granted an employer’s request for a preliminary injunction that barred enforcement of the state’s law bestowing jurisdiction over many labor disputes upon their Public Employment Relations Board. And in late December, another federal judge granted the NLRB’s request for a preliminary injunction to block California’s law.


A new labor law for cannabis employers in New Jersey:

Via a heads-up from employment law attorney and Seyfarth partner Joseph Vento, New Jersey cannabis workers will be able to unionize in Spring 2026. To be more specific, this bill will be effective on May 12 and eliminate this industry’s grey area involving which workers are considered agricultural and therefore not covered by the NLRA.


In short, the NJ State Board of Mediation’s authority (within the NJ Department of Labor and Workforce Development) will cover any workers within this industry who do not have NLRA protections.


Statewide, cannabis employers will be subject to increased labor oversight and $5,000 per day noncompliance penalties. The law’s provisions are vast, including how businesses must not only not interfere with organizing activity but must also allow union access to workplace meetings, lists of workers, and any employee living quarters controlled by the employer. Unions will also be allowed to publicly encourage boycotts during disputes.


This legislation takes employer requirements far beyond the labor peace agreement requirement already existing for cannabis employers in New Jersey. Whether this bill amounts to mere smoke puffs that will evaporate or a persistent cloud that will pass to other states, we’ll have to wait and see.


The New York nursing strike could last for weeks:

On Monday of this week, around 15,000 members of the NY State Nurses Association (NYNSA) went on strike at three private, nonprofit hospital systems--Mount Sinai, Montefiore, and NewYork-Presbyterian. Two of the hospitals will return to the bargaining table on Friday, but future sessions will likely be scheduled via a mediator.


Both sides expect the strike to run for weeks, and these hospital systems prepared by hiring replacement nurses to the tune of at least $100 million. Meanwhile, NYNSA’s demands include better staffing ratios, increased pension and healthcare contributions, and dramatic salary increases.


How dramatic? Montefiore nurses’ average base salary is $165,000. NYNSA demands that this be raised to $220,000. In a response to CBS News, Montefiore Senior VP of Strategic Communications Joe Solmonese describes the union’s demands as “reckless,” not only for drastic wage increases but also in reportedly “demanding that a nurse not be terminated if found to be compromised by drugs or alcohol while on the job.”


In 2023, the last major NYC nursing strike involved 7,000 nurses, lasted three days, and ended with 19% raises over three years.


Has the SEIU “broken” California?

That’s the claim proffered by the Center for Public Accountability’s Marc Joffe in an article published by the California Policy Center. Joffe lays out his case by detailing how SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW) helped devise a potential wealth tax that motivated Google’s co-founders to be among the billionaires who exited the Golden State.


The cumulative effects of this exodus could reduce tech industry jobs in California, which would have the opposite effect intended upon tax revenue. The law could also harm Silicon Valley tech workers who want to stay gainfully employed without leaving the state. Then again, this wouldn’t be the first SEIU kerfuffle to hurt California workers.


One recent example of this union’s heavy-handed lobbying ways would be the FAST Recovery Act, AB 1228, which went into effect in 2024 and raised fast-food minimum wage to $20 per hour. The law also created an illusory union, the California Fast Food Workers Union, through which the SEIU hopes to one day achieve sectoral bargaining for an entire industry.


That bargaining hasn’t happened yet, but the law did force many employers to cut labor costs to absorb the financial effects.


AI? It’s not “alright” for one movie star:

SAG-AFTRA member Matthew McConaughey is challenging those who would misuse AI regarding his image or likeness. The Dazed and Confused star is trademarking his most infamous line, “alright, alright, alright,” and Wall Street Journal reports that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has approved several applications of the star reciting those words.


The Oscar winner explained to the publication, “My team and I want to know that when my voice or likeness is ever used, it’s because I approved and signed off on it.”


Meanwhile, SAG-AFTRA recently announced that they will start contract renewal negotiations with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers on Feb. 9, and their contract expires on March 16. Additionally, WGA’s contract will expire on May 1 with negotiation dates still under wraps. For both unions, AI guardrails will be on the table again, especially for the issue of training AI systems on studios’ content.


About Labor Relations INK

Labor Relations INK is published weekly and is edited by LRI Consulting Services, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it. New subscribers can sign up by visiting here.


If you use content from this newsletter, please attribute it to LRI Consulting Services, Inc. and include our website: http://www.LRIonline.com 


Contributing editors for this issue: Greg Kittinger, Michael VanDervort, and Kimberly Ricci.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.


About LRI Consulting Services, Inc.

LRI Consulting Services, Inc. exists to help our clients thrive and become extraordinary workplaces. We improve the lives of working people by strengthening relationships with their leaders and each other. For over 40 years, LRI Consulting Services, Inc. has led the labor and employee relations industry, driven by our core values and our proven process, the LRI Way.

 

Share