CP Texas News 27 May 2009
May 27th, 2009 at 9:58 am CDT
If the Republicans don't fight this
racist appointee of Obama to the Supreme Court, to the last vote, then
it's time for you to switch to a party that will fight this kind of
nonsense! You want HOPE? Vote your Conscience, for a REAL
Change! Vote Constitution Party of Texas. Attend our State
Conference, June 13, at College Station. Information
here. ***
AMERICA
***
Barack Obama has ended the well publicized speculation concerning the
identity of his first Supreme Court nominee by naming to the critical
High Court seat a well publicized contender Sonia Sotomayor. Sotomayor
has been tapped to take the seat of retiring Justice David Souter.
Souter, a Reagan appointment, turned sour on the Court and has been a
staunch Reconstructionist an opponent of the Constitutionalist theory
necessary if our Constitution and culture are to survive and thrive.
What can we expect of Sotomayor? We offer a preliminary view
below. For several years, Court Watch has identified and articulated the
essential characteristics of a Constitutionalist judge. This description
is presented below in "A Portrait of a Constitutionalist
Judge." We follow this "yardstick" with "A Portrait
of Judge Sotomayor." Isn't it time for the Constitution Party? Obama Makes His First U.S. Supreme Court Pick: From Souter to Sotomayor Taken from Eagle Forum's Court Watch - May 26, 2009 A Portrait of a Constitutionalist Judge
A Portrait of Judge Sonia Sotomayor Educational and Professional Background Judge Sonia Sotomayor graduated from Princeton University summa cum laude in 1976 and attended Yale Law School. At Yale, she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal and managing editor of the Yale Studies in World Public Order. She began her legal career in 1979 as an Assistant District Attorney in New York County. Since October 7th, 1998, Sonia Sotomayor has been a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Despite the fact that President George H.W. Bush nominated Sotomayor for the district court judgeship, there is more to the story. "When President Bush nominated Sotomayor in 1991, the New York senators Moynihan and D'Amato, had forced on the White House a deal that enabled a senator not of the President's party to name one of every four District Court nominees in New York. Sotomayor was Moynihan's pick." According to Ed Whelan, it is likely that Bush only nominated her to move along the other nominees that Moynihan was holding up. Judicial Activism Judge Sotomayor appears willing to expand constitutional rights beyond the text of the Constitution. The most direct example of this is found in her decision in Malesko v. Correctional Services Corp., 229 F. 3d 374 (2d Cir 2000), rev'd 534 U.S. 61 (2001). In that case, Judge Sotomayor attempted to expand the liability of individual federal agents who violate constitutional rights to include corporations. In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit's decision. Chief Justice Rehnquist noted that the plaintiff was "seek a marked extension of Bivens, to a context that would not advance Bivens' core purpose of deterring individual officers from engaging in unconstitutional wrongdoing." Correctional Services Corp v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001). Sovereignty Judge Sotomayor has written a foreword to a book called The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World's Cases, which suggests that she believes foreign case law and statutes have a role in the adjudication of U.S. cases. Track Record In an October 3, 2008 commentary on National Review Online, Ed Whelan pointed out that "n those occasions on which the Supreme Court has reviewed Sotomayor's rulings, she hasn't fared well, drawing some pointed criticism and garnering at most 11 out of 44 possible votes for her reasoning across five cases. No one expects that Barack Obama will select federal judges who are faithful to the Constitution, and many Americans (especially we Constitutionalists) have expressed a sense of alienation and futility in opposing Obama nominees. The truth is, however, that now is the time to mount the most vigorous campaign possible on behalf of Constitutionalist principles. James Madison said it well, "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: and a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power that knowledge gives." Now is the perfect time to arm ourselves with knowledge to become knowledge-empowered! Constitution Party of Texas • • |
Help us keep the lights on. Click here to make a donation today. CONTACT US Was this message forwarded to you by a friend? You can sign up for our Newsletter for FREE! Go here: http://www.cptexas.us/list.html |