Your Dog May Be Smart, but She’s Not Exceptional

January 16th, 2019 at 9:15 am EDT
Hello Friend,

Welcome to Wednesday!

The following  article is somewhat controversial, coming from the New York Times..

I don't necessarily agree, but there are some things that you can do to help your dog ( and cat's ) brain.

You can get a TRIAL 37% OFF my dog and cat supplements by going here

My last Dog Lewis, pictured below..was exceptional.  

My newish dog Tula, (2nd pic), would not qualify as exceptional, but she is very sweet :-)
Your Dog May Be Smart, but She’s Not Exceptional

By Laura M. Holson, New York Times

Cat lovers of the world rejoice!

In the long-simmering dispute over whether dogs are smarter than cats, a recent study published in the journal Learning & Behavior suggests that dogs are no more exceptional than other animals when it comes to canniness and intelligence.

The news is sure to ignite debate (watch the fur fly!) among dog owners and scientists who study canine behavior. The authors reviewed existing studies and data on animal cognition and found that while dogs are smart and trainable, they are not “super smart,” despite what most dog owners will tell you.

The idea for the study came about when Stephen Lea, an emeritus professor in the psychology department at the University of Exeter in Britain, was editor of Animal Cognition, a journal that seeks to explain cognition among humans and animals in the context of evolution. Dog research, he said in an interview last week, was quite popular in the 1990s and continues to be so.

“I was getting a number of papers showing how remarkable the things were that dogs could do,” he said. When it came to other animals, though, scientific studies on intelligence barely trickled in, despite evidence to suggest that horses, chimpanzees and cats had tricks of their own. “Almost everything a dog claimed to do, other animals could do too,” Dr. Lea said. “It made me quite wary that dogs were special.”

Sure, there is Chaser, a Border collie from Spartanburg, S.C., who was trained to understand 1,022 nouns. (His owner, John Pilley, a scientist who studied canine cognition, recently died.) Before that was a Border collie named Rico who learned to recognize the names of 200 items. But beyond those examples, Dr. Lea wondered: Had dog lovers (and scientists, for that matter) imbued their pets with extraordinary capabilities they did not possess?

To be fair, Dr. Lea said he was a cat person. Still, he and Britta Osthaus, a senior lecturer in the School of Psychology, Politics and Sociology at Canterbury Christ Church University in Britain, set out to test the hypothesis.

They compared dog cognition with members of three similar groups: carnivores, social hunters and domestic animals. Among the animals they studied were wolves, cats, chimpanzees, dolphins, horses and pigeons. What they found, Dr. Lea said, was that “dog cognition does not look exceptional.”

Dr. Lea said dogs cannot use tools, unlike dolphins, New Caledonian crows and chimpanzees, which have been observed using plant stems to fish for termites. Homing pigeons are trained to fly home, sometimes crossing hundreds of miles of unfamiliar terrain. “Far be it for me to suggest that pigeons are smarter than dogs; they are not intellectual giants,” Dr. Lea said. “But if you want to get 1,000 miles, I trust a pigeon over a dog.”

(Perhaps that explains the plot of the 1996 feel-good animal buddy movie “Homeward Bound 2: Lost in San Francisco,” featuring the odyssey of Shadow, a golden retriever; Sassy, a Himalayan cat; and Chance, an American bulldog.)

At the same time, domesticated animals share similar traits with their canine cohorts. Horses, like dogs, perform elaborate tasks. And cats? They have more in common with dogs than one might think. Still, he said, “It is much easier to show intelligence in dogs because they like to be trained.” Dogs, Dr. Lea added, “are not smarter than they are supposed to be, given what they are.”

Where dogs stand out, according to Clive Wynne, the director of the Canine Science Collaboratory at Arizona State University, is their capacity for affection. He said there was merit in Dr. Lea’s study. “He’s not putting dogs down,” said Dr. Wynne, a dog lover. “He is putting them in context.”

“I was quoted once calling my dog a lovable idiot,” Dr. Wynne said, recalling a 2017 article in The New York Times. “A guy wrote a whole blog post about what an awful person I was.”

For his part, Dr. Lea is bracing for the inevitable backlash. “We are not trying to say dogs are stupid,” he said. “We just don’t think that they are extraordinary. And that is not a neutral thing to say.”

One thing is sure, though: They’re all good dogs.

Veterinary Secrets Pet of the Week!
Another exceptional dog..

Here she is....Sarah Little Bear!! Best girl in the WORLD!!!!!!

If you would like your pet to be the Pet of the Week, please send a picture to
Heal Your Pet At Home!

Best Wishes,

Dr Andrew Jones, DVM
P.S. The professor who performed the study is a 'self confessed' cat person.. cat bias?

I have had a few exceptional dogs in my lifetime..clearly many dogs are.

Meaning don't believe everything you read :-)

P.P.S. If you have yet to TRY my supplements, I encourage you to do so, for now they are 37% OFF, and NO Autoship

DISCLAIMER: This information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to replace the advice of your own veterinarian. Dr Andrew Jones resigned from the College of Veterinarians of B.C. effective December 1 2010, meaning he cannot answer specific questions about your pet's medical issues or make specific medical recommendations for your pet.

PRIVACY POLICY: We will never rent, sell, loan, provide, barter, exchange or in any way make available your personal information to others. You can unsubscribe or change your email address at any time using the links at the bottom of this email.

Copyright 2013 Four Paws Online Ltd.

Tel: 1-800-396-1534
Fax: 1-888-398-1378

Four Paws Online Ltd.
2124 Ymir Road
Nelson BC V1L6Y9

You may unsubscribe or change your contact details at any time.