Subject: Your Cost-Effective Alternative to a HIL

Avoid Sporadic Failures
Dear Friend,
The HIL has achieved an almost divine status in the automotive industry. It is, after all, the electronic embodiment of a series production vehicle. But do we need it as often as we think?

Additionally, a HIL can only test software that currently exists. Determining whether there is enough performance for additional features relies upon a healthy portion of guesswork.


Model-based simulation not only allows such issues to be determined more quickly, they allow a higher test coverage thanks to stochastic testing. And, when it comes to adding new features, virtual verification only needs the timing budget of the functions to be implemented, not the final code. This is sufficient to quickly assess performance requirements and potential system bottlenecks.

In our case study “Cost-Effective Alternative to HIL” we review the case for increased use of virtual verification to reduce dependence on HILs that is available to download here:

Yours,
INCHRON team
Dr. Ralf Münzenberger, Dr. Ingmar Roggatz, Olaf Schmidt
Learn more

Contact us
E-Mail | Contact Form | call +49-331-279-7892-0 | free 30 min expert consulting
When function meets time
INCHRON AG, Neumühle 24-26, 91056 Erlangen, Germany; Executive Management: Dr. Ralf Münzenberger, Matthias Dörfel; Registered at Local Court of Potsdam (Germany) under file HRB 23358P. Please see our Privacy Policy.
You may unsubscribe or change your contact details at any time.