Subject: Special Newsletter #01 January 14, 2022

Newsletter #01 January 13, 2022

TRAINING UPDATES

Mark your Calendars 

for our

2022 Leadership Training Series 


We will again be offering Virtual classes the first of the year then moving to In-person classes in the fall 


Workshop Schedule

First of Year Offering is Virtual  
Materials will be provided in PDF format by email after registration.

Virtual Series

02/16/22 Virtual Leadership I 

03/02/22   Virtual Leadership II 

03/23/22    Virtual Leadership III 

04/13/22   Virtual Leadership IV 

05/18/22   Virtual Leadership V 

06/01/22   Virtual Leadership VI 



Visit Website for Overview and Pricing


EMPLOYMENT LAW NEWS

Constangy.com News & Analysis


Highlights from the OSHA vaccine ETS argument at the Supreme Court

BY ROBIN SHEA ON 1.11.22
POSTED IN CORONAVIRUSSAFETYVACCINATION


While we wait.


I was really hoping that by yesterday the Supreme Court would have stayed the Emergency Temporary Standard that was issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Maybe today?


Meanwhile, here are some excerpts from the oral argument, which took place on Friday morning and lasted two hours! My comments, such that they are, are in lilac. If you'd like to hear/read the whole argument, you can listen to the audio and get the transcript here. I think it's safe to say that Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor will not be voting to stay the ETS.


Excerpts from oral argument in National Federation of

Independent Business v. Department of Labor


Justice Thomas (on the requirement that an ETS be "necessary): 

"[N]ecessary can be really necessary or not necessarily really necessary." ROBIN - Hehe.


Scott Keller (attorney for parties who want the stay and believe the ETS is unlawful): "The emergency power must be necessary. The regular power that OSHA wields has to be reasonably necessary or appropriate." (Emphasis added.) 


Justice Thomas: "So the fact that . . . it's emergency sort of ups the ante, that 'necessary' has to be more restrictive?"


Attorney Keller: "Yes . . .."


Justice Kagan: "[W]hy isn't [the ETS] necessary to abate a grave risk? This is a pandemic in which nearly a million people have died. It is by far the greatest public health danger that this country has faced in the last century. . . . And this is the policy that is most geared to stopping all this. There's nothing else that will perform that function better than incentivizing people strongly to vaccinate themselves. . . . [OSHA] has done everything but stand on its head to show quite clearly that no other policy will prevent sickness and death to anywhere like the degree this one will."


Chief Justice Roberts: "[H]ow focused on the workplace does something have to be before you will say that OSHA can regulate it?"


Justice Breyer: "[T]here were three-quarters of a million new cases yesterday. New cases. Nearly three-quarters, 700-and-some-odd thousand, okay? That's 10 times as many as when OSHA put this rule in [on November 5]. . . . let me not exaggerate -- nearly three-quarters of a million people, new cases every day? . . . How can [a stay of the ETS] conceivably be in the public interest with three-quarters of a million people yesterday, goodness knows how many today -- I don't want to repeat myself    . . .." ROBIN - Justice Breyer later mistakenly referred to "750 million new cases." That is almost twice the population of the United States. But his estimate of 750,000 or so is accurate. 


Attorney Keller: "The question is not what is this country going to do about COVID. It's who gets to decide that." ROBIN - Those opposed to the ETS argue that any vaccination or testing mandates should be issued by the states or through federal legislation enacted by Congress, not by OSHA.


Attorney Keller (later): "Congress and states and governors wielding emergency power are the ones that have the power . . . over vaccines. The idea that OSHA would be the agency in the federal government that's not even under the Department of Health and Human Services, that does not have expertise over communicable diseases like the [Food and Drug Administration] or [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] maybe, that would just be a very odd place for Congress . . . to lodge such a sweeping power over the American people." 


Justice Gorsuch: "Why should the Court grant immediate relief [in the form of a stay]?"


Attorney Keller: "[A]s soon as businesses have to put out their plans and this takes effect, workers will quit. That itself will be a permanent worker displacement that will ripple through the national economy."......READ MORE OF THIS HIGHLIGHT >>


Constangy.com News & Analysis


CMS issues guidance for rule mandating

COVID-19 vaccines for most health care workers

By David Kurtz

Boston, New York, Los Angeles, and Orange County Offices

and
Sabrina Punia-Ly

Los Angeles and Orange County Offices


01.12.22


On December 28, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued long-awaited guidance regarding how it intends to enforce its Interim Final Rule mandating COVID-19 vaccinations for certain health care workers. The rule, which is currently enjoined in 25 states, requires that most employees (and some non-employees) of covered facilities that receive Medicare or Medicaid funds be fully vaccinated. The new guidance will apply only in the states where the rule has not been enjoined.


The CMS has also issued 14 provider-specific guidance documents that should be reviewed along with the general guidance. (Links are provided below.) 


Starting a week from Thursday (January 22), federal, state, accreditation, and CMS-contracted surveyors will begin monitoring for full compliance subject to the three-phase rollout plan described below.


Phase 1 (due January 22)
Phase 1 requires covered facilities to be able to show the following:

  • That they have developed and implemented policies and procedures that ensure all staff are vaccinated for COVID-19 (regardless of clinical responsibility or patient contact); and

  • That all staff either

  • Have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine

  • Have a pending request for a qualifying exemption

  • Have been granted a request for a qualifying exemption, or

  • Have identified as meriting a temporary delay as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

All staff at covered facilities must be vaccinated, unless they fall within an exemption or are identified as meriting a temporary delay.  If not, the employer will not be considered compliant with the rule. However, enforcement action will not be taken if a facility is more than 80 percent compliant and has a plan to achieve 100 percent compliance within 60 days.


Phase 2 Compliance (due February 28)
Phase 2 requires covered facilities show the following by Monday, February 28 (the actual deadline falls on Saturday, February 26):

  • Developed and implemented policies and procedures that ensure all staff are vaccinated for COVID-19 (regardless of clinical responsibility or patient contact); and

  • That all staff have either

  • Received the necessary doses to complete the vaccine series (i.e., one dose of a single-dose vaccine or all doses of a multi-dose vaccine series)

  • Been granted a qualifying exemption, or

  • Been identified as meriting a temporary delay as recommended by the CDC.

All staff must be vaccinated, unless exempted or identified as meriting a temporary delay. Otherwise, the facility will not be considered compliant. A non-compliant facility will not be subject to enforcement action if it is 90 percent compliant and has a plan to achieve 100 percent compliance within 30 days.


Phase 3 (due March 28)
Covered facilities must be 100 percent compliant with the standard by Monday, March 28.


What will the survey process involve?

Generally, the survey process will assess compliance with the rule through observation, interview, and record review. For example, surveyors will ask the facility to provide the following for review:

  • COVID-19 vaccination policies and procedures

  • List of all staff and their vaccination status

  • Contingency plan to mitigate the spread of COVID-19

Surveyors will also review a random sample of records for staff who have been identified as unvaccinated due to clinical contraindications (e.g., severe allergic reaction) or a qualifying exemption.   Covered facilities should look to the applicable provider-specific guidance for more details.


How will the CMS enforce compliance?

Depending on the severity of the non-compliance and the type of facility, sanctions can include the following:

  • A plan of correction

  • Civil monetary penalties

  • Denial of payment

  • Termination from the Medicare/Medicaid program

Facilities should consult the provider-specific guidance to assess the potential penalties in more detail.  For example, the sole enforcement remedy for hospitals and certain acute care and continuing care providers (after being given an opportunity to rectify noncompliance) is termination from the Medicare/Medicaid program.


Where can I get the provider-specific guidance that applies to my facility?


Right here!

Ambulatory Surgical Centers

Community Mental Health Centers

Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

Critical Access Hospitals

End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities

Home Health Agencies

Home Infusion Therapy

Hospice

Hospitals

Intermediate Care Facility for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities

Long-Term Care and Skilled Nursing Facility

Outpatient Physical Therapy

Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility

Rural Health Clinic/Federally Qualified Health Clinic


What’s the latest on the legal challenge to the CMS mandate?

As our readers know, the CMS mandate has been enjoined (blocked) in the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. (It remains in force in all the other states.) The government has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to dissolve the injunctions.

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument as to whether the CMS exceeded its authority by issuing the vaccine mandate. Although no ruling has been issued, news reports indicate that the justices may vote to uphold the mandate. Accordingly, covered facilities in states where the mandate is in effect should ensure that they are ready to meet the Phase 1 requirements by the January 22 deadline, if not all of the requirements.


Covered facilities in states where the injunctions are still in place should consider having the required policies and procedures prepared in the event that the Supreme Court upholds the CMS mandate and makes it effective nationwide.

For a printer-friendly copy, click here.



HRDive.com BRIEF

Second Starbucks store wins union election after NLRB sustains ballot challenges

Published Jan. 11, 2022

Aneurin Canham-Clyne Associate Editor


Dive Brief:

  • After the National Labor Relations Board Region 3 sustained challenges from Starbucks Workers United to seven ballots, the union on Monday secured a majority of votes at the Starbucks on Genesee Street in Cheektowaga, New York, NLRB Press Secretary Kayla Blado confirmed to Restaurant Dive. This is the second Starbucks store to win union representation.

  • Starbucks confirmed to Restaurant Dive that it was exploring the possibility of an appeal to overturn the NLRB's decision.

  • Starbucks Workers United's campaign has heated up in recent days, with filings for elections in Chicago; Cleveland; and Eugene, Oregon. Workers at a Starbucks in Hopewell, New Jersey, announced their intent to unionize on Jan. 11. 
    ....Click Here to READ MORE of the Insight>>>


HRDive.com Q&A

3 industry stakeholders on the
pros and cons of 'culture fit'

Published Jan. 12, 2022

By Carla Bell / Senior Editor


The pandemic has changed life and business. It's changed the way we bring ourselves to the work we do, and it's even changed who we feel we can be at work. 


In a way, just like people, a business may approach a new year with a sense of new resolution and adventure. What does a company want to be about? What message does it want to send? This goes to the heart of organizational posture, dubbed "company culture." 


HR Dive asked professionals in talent and DEI spaces to unpack this industry phraseology, "company culture," and "culture fit," often paired in conversations. As these leaders suggest, they can be confusing and sometimes loaded terms that should prompt a pause for deeper thought and questions...READ MORE of Q&A HERE>>>



www.georgiaemployers.org

Phone: 478-722-8282
Fax: 478-722-8244


Powered by:
GetResponse