3. Increase in Fines and Its Scope of Application:
There is a general tendency towards increasing fines and the scope of its application in the CM Law Amendment. • The CM Law Amendment extended the scope of breaches under article 63 of the CM Law to include, amongst others, the following breaches:
- wilfully breaching representations in relation to minority shareholders’ rights or sukuk holders’ rights;
- wilfully breaching FRA’s criteria for financial evaluation;
- issuing or offering sukuk for trading in contrary to the CM Law; and
- undertaking fraudulent evaluation of assets.
• Instead of having the usual minimum and maximum thresholds for fines under the CM Law, the CM Law Amendment introduced an additional benchmarking to the amount of (i) gained revenues; or (ii) avoided losses.
• Accordingly, minimum thresholds on certain fines are now pegged to either: (i) the minimum thresholds set out in the law; or the amount of revenues gained or losses avoided by the violator, whichever is higher. Similarly, the caps on certain fines are now pegged to either: (i) the minimum thresholds set out in the law; or double the amount of revenues gained or losses avoided by the violator, whichever is higher. Depending on the circumstances of the violation, this can result in significant and rather unpredictable financial liability for certain violations depending on the assessment of the revenues gained or losses avoided.
• The CM Law Amendment further introduced the following specific penalty for acquiring shares and/or securities, in breach of the MTO rules:
o a fine of not less than EGP 100,000 and not exceeding EGP 500,000; o the defaulting party cannot settle/reconcile with FRA unless the defaulting party (i) presents a compliant MTO with respect to the shares and/or securities in question; and (ii) pays settlement payment to FRA of not less than 1% of the value of the relevant shares and/or securities subject matter of the violation and not exceeding 10% of the value of such shares and/or securities.
• The CM Law Amendment increased the cap for disposing securities or financial instruments in breach of the CM Law to be EGP 100,000 instead of EGP 10,000.
4. Liability of CEOs, Bane Now Relieved?
The CM Law Amendment introduced some limitations on the liability of directors responsible for actual management (CEOs and executives) for the company’s breach of the CM Law. This was a major concern as the CM Law imposed such liability in absolute. Now directors responsible for actual management (CEOs and executives) are liable only to the extent that (i) they had actual knowledge of the breach; and (ii) the breach was a result of their failure to perform their managerial duties.
5. Easier Procedures for Issuing Short-term Debt Securities:
In a step to facilitate and encourage short-term debt instruments, issuing short-term debt securities or Sukuk of maturity date not exceeding 2 years could be through a BOD resolution instead of a general meeting (GM) resolution provided that (i) the BOD is authorized by a GM or an authorized entity; and (ii) issuance will be according to FRA’s regulations and procedures.
6. Dual Listing:
The CM Law Amendment now adheres to current practice and the listing rules by allowing dual listing provided that FRA’s approval is obtained.
7. Are We Moving Towards Electronic Publication of Prospectus?
The CM Law Amendment removed the explicit requirement of publishing prospectus, semi-annual reports, annual FS and summary of any substantial events that affects the activities or financial status of a listed company or a company that offered its shares to the public in two widely spread newspapers. Further referring to FRA’s board of directors (BOD) to issue the publication requirements. We hope this would pave the way for FRA to introduce electronic publications, especially that the original proposed amendments included electronic publications on FRA’s website.
8. Are There Any Changes in Disclosure Obligations?
The CM Law Amendment removed pre-acquisition disclosures with respect to substantial acquisitions in listed companies or companies which have offered its shares to the public and instead refers to the ER for regulating all aspects of acquisitions and purchase offers including disclosures. Unless the ER is amended to re-introduce the pre-acquisition disclosures, such amendment may be a step towards cancelling the pre-acquisition disclosure required when (i) a shareholder intends to make an acquisition that would result in owning shares amounting in aggregate to more than 10% of the issued nominal share capital of an issuer, or (ii) a BOD or an employee intends to make an acquisition that would result in owning shares amounting in aggregate to more than 5% of the issued nominal share capital of an issuer.
9. New Opportunities for Capital Markets’ Companies!
a) Exchange Companies:
An Exchange Company is a company established for trading in one or more securities such as trading in future contracts. The CM Law Amendment allows for the establishment of Exchange Companies after obtaining FRA’s approval, while the old law and the current ER requires the approval of the relevant minister. We expect that the ER would be amended to comply with the CM Law Amendment. Such change in the required approval paves the way for more simple procedures of establishment and licensing, similar to other capital markets’ companies licensed and regulated by FRA.
The CM Law Amendment restricts the establishment of Exchange Companies to JSCs, which is a natural requirement for Capital Markets companies.
According to the CM Law Amendment, the FRA would have very broad authorities over Exchange Companies such as the authority to prevent the company from undertaking its activities, removing its BOD and appointing a representative to manage the company or obliging the company to increase its insurance with FRA.
b) Subscription in Investment Funds:
The CM Law Amendment explicitly allows licensed companies to receive subscriptions in fund certificates, which was an activity monopolized by banks.
c) Undertaking Fund’s Activities:
The CM Law Amendment allows licensed companies undertaking non-banking activities, as determined by a decree to be issued by FRA, to undertake Investment Funds activities, while the old provisions of the CM Law restricted this activity to banks and licensed insurance companies.
d) Sukuk:
Are you an Egyptian company looking to expand your operations (the “Borrower”), an International Financial Institution (IFI) or an investor looking to invest in Egypt, a Capital Markets’ Group looking for new opportunities? If YES, then we prepared this tutorial especially for you! |