Subject: By what name do I call thee?

Dear Friend,


I'm working on a sermon, which I will be giving this Sunday, at Manhattan Mennonite Church. I was asked by the pastor there, my friend Jason Storbakken, because of our work around Land Acknowledgements


I’m impressed with the work they’ve already done: building relationships; engaging with the Repair Network, a Mennonite-initiated network that stems from the Dismantling the Doctrine of Discovery Coalition; and a lot of listening. Given how much they are already doing, I admit I was a little surprised they asked me to speak about this particular topic.  


So I sat in prayer, to see what might be said. 


The title for the sermon came quickly: By What Name Do I call Thee? 


I feel like I’m surfing/floating/swimming amongst a confluence of mighty rivers here…: Names that God calls us and names we call God; the sheer importance of naming; the relationship between names and discovery, especially the Doctrine of Discovery; land acknowledgments as re-naming and re-turning to older names; the power of changing the meaning of a name, especially family names; shifting the shared collective imagination of place through names and their meanings….


Names are entry places to change stories, especially origin stories, and stories of lineages, and stories of possibilities. 


Shakespeare:  the rose by any other name is still a rose, Juliet tells Romeo. But at the end of that story, the star-crossed lovers die. Because names, and what we associate with them, matter.  And, as the feuding families eventually (fatally?) recognize, the meaning we give a name can change. All is possible in communication.  


And in communication, so much goes wrong. or at least perpetuates problems.


Which is part of where land acknowledgments can fall flat. And where they can be distinctly unsatisfying.


I like to think that they should be unsatisfying. Their continued unsatisfaction is part of what can prompt groups to keep searching. To keep going. To unlearn. To relearn. To shift stories and actions and consciousness and future possibilities. To change what the names that we give ourselves and the names  (of the roles) we are given - administrator, actor, participant, leader, environmentalist, peacebuilder, investor, writer, educator, inheritor - mean.  Storytellers, all of us.

 




Which is part of why my partner Kristine and I are offering our next course on Land Acknowledgements: Bridging and Revealing. It's going to be a skill-building and highly participatory course. We are focusing on bridging - going from land acknowledgment to the topic. And storytelling - using the space opened by the land acknowledgment to tell different stories. To create different rituals and mini ceremonies. To engage in different actions.  All of it is shaped by you and your context.  It's going to be a short, powerful course. I hope you would like to learn more here. 


Because we are at a moment in human history when we have that rare chance to engage in re-imagining and often re-naming where we are.


To rename where we are, and where we come from,  to participate in a shared confession that the history and the maps as they have been written in the past few centuries are not the whole truth, opens up a new arc of possibility.


We invite you to join us. It's just three sessions followed by an optional fourth session. Totally doable. 

And whatever you do- engage with the mystery. It’s one of the things I keep coming back to in delving into Names. The name of god, the name of land. The names we call one another. There’s a bit of a mystery in all of it: naming, being named, changing names, and the mystery of all that is, ultimately, unnameable. 



All the best,

Sara Jolena

Rev. Sara Jolena Wolcott, MDiv