[ASI] A Fishy Nomination

July 10th, 2018 at 12:24 pm EDT
   
Cliff Kincaid
President.
America's Survival, Inc.
www.usasurvival.org
www.religiousleftexposed.com
www.sorosfiles.com
www.leninandsharia.com




To ASI Supporters:

In their hearts, the liberals know Brett Kavanaugh is one of the best picks they could have hoped for. As one of my readers said about Trump’s nominee:

I've come to believe that all the media outrage and democrat opposition is just a big smoke screen to keep us in our social boxes. The more the left screams about Trump the less the so-called right takes the time to evaluate what he does and what he says. I think we have been fooled in a big way.

Kavanaugh supported Obamacare, the Roe v. Wade abortion decision, and NSA surveillance. Plus, he covered-up the Foster murder.

Click here

Politico, citing original sources, notes that Kavanaugh called Roe v. Wade the “binding precedent of the court” and added “I would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully.” Kavanaugh said that during his 2006 confirmation hearing for the D.C. appellate court. “It’s been reaffirmed many times.”

My friends, this is a disastrous nomination.

We are hearing reports that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy agreed to retire if Trump promised to replace him with Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh was one of Kennedy’s clerks.

If true, this means that a deal was made and that all of the discussion back and forth about possible nominees was indeed a show designed to confuse and mislead us.

This nomination is as fishy as the Foster death. The conservative American Family Association is opposing Kavanaugh, saying, “Judge Kavanaugh is simply the wrong nominee-even a bad nominee. Based on his written opinions, Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated a deficiency in a constitutional judicial philosophy of a limited judiciary. Some of his decisions may have been favorable, but several of his opinions about those decisions contain problematic language.”

AFA adds:

Other concerns relate to his writings on Obamacare. It’s been argued that Judge Kavanaugh provided the roadmap to uphold the Obama Administration’s healthcare overreach at the Supreme Court. Judge Kavanaugh is said to provide the legal argument for Chief Justice to save Obamacare by calling the mandatory insurance a tax.

I did an interview with radio host Sam Bushman this morning and we discussed the fact that we need only a couple of conservative Senators to derail this nomination. They could raise the Foster case or the issue of Kavanaugh’s defense of Obama’s NSA surveillance.

Yes, you heard that right – Kavanaugh defended Obama’s NSA surveillance scheme. Senators Mike Lee and Rand Paul and others could vote against Kavanaugh on that basis alone. Here are the members of the Judiciary committee which will address the nomination:

Majority Members (11)

Minority Members (10)

Grassley, Chuck (IA), Chairman 
Hatch, Orrin G. (UT)
Graham, Lindsey (SC)
Cornyn, John (TX)
Lee, Mike (UT)
Cruz, Ted (TX)
Sasse, Ben (NE)
Flake, Jeff (AZ)
Crapo, Mike (ID)
Tillis, Thom (NC)
Kennedy, John (LA)

Feinstein, Dianne (CA), Ranking Member 
Leahy, Patrick J. (VT)
Durbin, Richard J. (IL)
Whitehouse, Sheldon (RI)
Klobuchar, Amy (MN)
Coons, Christopher A. (DE)
Blumenthal, Richard (CT)
Hirono, Mazie K. (HI)
Booker, Cory A. (NJ)
Harris, Kamala D. (CA)

People are asking me what they can do. Send a link from our video on the case to your local Senator and his aide dealing with the Supreme Court. Ask them to watch the video and seek answers from Kavanaugh about his role in the Foster death cover-up. (202) 224-3121 United States Senate.

Most so-called “conservatives” are supporting the nomination. If they have positions of power in the media, they will attempt to suppress our point of view. That’s why we need YOUR support. My plan is for more TV shows, a quickie book, and Internet ads. Will you help?

Judicial Watch has deserted us. On our side, however, is Larry Klayman and Freedom Watch. He is opposing Kavanaugh. Before the nomination, Larry wrote a piece for WND entitled, THE JUDGE TRUMP MUST NOT PICK FOR SCOTUS. He noted that, in a court case on Obama’s NSA surveillance powers:

Judge Kavanaugh, without solid procedural basis, gratuitously wrote one [a written opinion] in which he grandstanded and pandered to the deep state intelligence agency establishment, validating this “almost Orwellian” mass surveillance. 

Can you believe Trump would nominate somebody who DEFENDED the Obama surveillance powers that were used against Trump? That’s the case with Kavanaugh.

Give me your thoughts at: Kincaid@comcast.net


For America’s Survival,


Cliff Kincaid,
President

 

 

 

Share Forward Twitter Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg